In message: [linux-yocto] Trial merge of v6.1.37 for linux-yocto
on 03/07/2023 Kevin Hao wrote:

> Hi Bruce,
> 
> This is a trial merge of the stable kernel v6.1.37 for the following branches 
> in the linux-yocto.
>   8d892de64eae  v6.1/standard/base
>   1731741189db  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/base
>   09afcc1faa8c  v6.1/standard/ti-sdk-6.1/ti-j7xxx
>   e25ad2b96628  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/ti-sdk-6.1/ti-j7xxx
>   13e8396d88e9  v6.1/standard/nxp-sdk-6.1/nxp-soc
>   d968f81135a3  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/nxp-sdk-6.1/nxp-soc
>   ac268c74ddaf  v6.1/standard/cn-sdkv5.15/octeon
>   3262893ecf96  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/cn-sdkv5.15/octeon
>   fafdaa74481e  v6.1/standard/bcm-2xxx-rpi
>   057bfcb3634c  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/bcm-2xxx-rpi
>   ead5553409d5  v6.1/standard/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-s32g
>   d34833412df0  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-s32g
>   5045330626d9  v6.1/standard/intel-sdk-6.1/intel-socfpga
>   7f0c89d64d28  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/intel-sdk-6.1/intel-socfpga
>   c8d32a06fe05  v6.1/standard/x86
>   34877dbed805  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/x86
>   85403683e574  v6.1/standard/sdkv6.1/xlnx-soc
>   90c49403a6d5  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/sdkv6.1/xlnx-soc
> 
> This is based on previous trial merge of v6.1.36 and there is no any merge 
> conflict.  
> All the branches have passed my build test. I have pushed all these branches 
> to:
>     https://github.com/haokexin/linux

Thanks Kevin,

I've done the same bump and didn't run into any issues, I've
staged it with my 6.4 reference kernel work.

Bruce

> 
> You can use this as a reference for the linux-yocto stable kernel bump.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin

> 
> 
> 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12844): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/12844
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/99918487/21656
Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/leave/6687884/21656/624485779/xyzzy
 [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to