From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> Similar to the argument of why we shouldn't force NUMA on everyone, the 9 chip registered ECC RAM type stuff also tends to be found mostly on larger server type stuff and less so on embedded targets.
We already have a skeleton EDAC feature, so move the features over there. One could argue that we might want to separate into arch specific config fragments, but to me - that seems overkill at this point in time. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> --- bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86-64.cfg | 13 ------------- features/edac/edac.cfg | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86-64.cfg b/bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86-64.cfg index f31711e73181..58b0fed637e8 100644 --- a/bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86-64.cfg +++ b/bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86-64.cfg @@ -3,19 +3,6 @@ # General setup # -# EDAC -CONFIG_EDAC=y -CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG=y -CONFIG_EDAC_SBRIDGE=m -CONFIG_ACPI_APEI=y -CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_EINJ=m -CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES=y -CONFIG_EDAC_PND2=m -CONFIG_EDAC_SKX=m -CONFIG_EDAC_I10NM=m -CONFIG_EDAC_IGEN6=m - - # ISH CONFIG_INTEL_ISH_HID=m diff --git a/features/edac/edac.cfg b/features/edac/edac.cfg index 9b3d3fc59eae..4f75d2f825ee 100644 --- a/features/edac/edac.cfg +++ b/features/edac/edac.cfg @@ -15,3 +15,11 @@ CONFIG_RAS=y CONFIG_EDAC=y CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG=y +CONFIG_EDAC_SBRIDGE=m +CONFIG_ACPI_APEI=y +CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_EINJ=m +CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES=y +CONFIG_EDAC_PND2=m +CONFIG_EDAC_SKX=m +CONFIG_EDAC_I10NM=m +CONFIG_EDAC_IGEN6=m -- 2.40.0
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13338): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/13338 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/102900653/21656 Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
