In message: Trial merge of v5.15.146 v6.1.71 v6.1.72 for linux-yocto
on 11/01/2024 Kevin Hao wrote:

> Hi Bruce,
> 
> This is a trial merge of the stable kernel v5.15.146 v6.1.71 v6.1.72 for the 
> following branches in the linux-yocto.
>   b5fbbdffbd1d  v5.15/standard/sdkv5.10/axxia
>   34c731e80124  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/sdkv5.10/axxia
>   78df6de45c41  v5.15/standard/base
>   c003aea6270f  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/base
>   acda83875cf7  v5.15/standard/cn-sdkv5.4/octeon
>   b565626a26a3  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/cn-sdkv5.4/octeon
>   a3dcf258cbda  v5.15/standard/cn-sdkv5.15/octeon
>   7d89a56da9b7  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/cn-sdkv5.15/octeon
>   ed0cc8da2e88  v5.15/standard/ti-sdk-5.10/ti-j72xx
>   e28b530e6247  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/ti-sdk-5.10/ti-j72xx
>   ffe5852a2c7f  v5.15/standard/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-soc
>   81fea11e748b  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-soc
>   c3b0326a9836  v5.15/standard/bcm-2xxx-rpi
>   c599c658073f  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/bcm-2xxx-rpi
>   56fe3933e51e  v5.15/standard/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-s32g
>   604ff2c32d51  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-s32g
>   726eca2a66d9  v5.15/standard/intel-sdk-5.15/intel-socfpga
>   6be2426ec014  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/intel-sdk-5.15/intel-socfpga
>   2db857672ddf  v5.15/standard/x86
>   cdb2d700d0d4  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/x86
>   9a2c2745484a  v5.15/standard/sdkv5.15/xlnx-soc                              
>    #Have textual conflicts
>   bb6eeb27272b  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/sdkv5.15/xlnx-soc                   
>    #Have textual conflicts
>   487e6be1e796  v6.1/standard/sdkv5.10/axxia
>   09ca58d30a61  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/sdkv5.10/axxia
>   65cb43829f54  v6.1/standard/base
>   9b470c6b1a4a  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/base
>   3d7f492abb3b  v6.1/standard/ti-sdk-6.1/ti-j7xxx
>   083c31589a50  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/ti-sdk-6.1/ti-j7xxx
>   43b4ace727bd  v6.1/standard/nxp-sdk-6.1/nxp-soc                             
>    #Have textual conflicts
>   e19ab0994bf0  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/nxp-sdk-6.1/nxp-soc                  
>    #Have textual conflicts
>   01933fe845f3  v6.1/standard/cn-sdkv5.15/octeon                              
>    #Have textual conflicts
>   81e3ecfaa788  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/cn-sdkv5.15/octeon                   
>    #Have textual conflicts
>   759be0248278  v6.1/standard/microchip-polarfire-soc
>   963104e893a5  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/microchip-polarfire-soc
>   a225b604b23e  v6.1/standard/bcm-2xxx-rpi
>   1b6aec075c14  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/bcm-2xxx-rpi
>   b7ec6e79cb49  v6.1/standard/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-s32g
>   8d09c3db19f5  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-s32g
>   576be20178bb  v6.1/standard/intel-sdk-6.1/intel-socfpga
>   eb99988e1dd2  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/intel-sdk-6.1/intel-socfpga
>   c67028a29335  v6.1/standard/x86
>   239989bc7c91  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/x86
>   a578437b296a  v6.1/standard/sdkv6.1/xlnx-soc                                
>    #Have textual conflicts
>   3629413a658c  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/sdkv6.1/xlnx-soc                     
>    #Have textual conflicts
> 
> In this stable release, there are many bloody merge conflicts on the v6.1 
> xlnx-soc
> branches. These conflicts are caused by the similar changes in both stable 
> kernel
> and SDK patches. We can resolve them by favoring the SDK version. All the 
> branches
> have passed my build test. I have pushed all these branches to:
>     https://github.com/haokexin/linux

Thanks Kevin,

I've done the same -stable updates here and everything has passed the standard 
BSP build / boot tests.

Bruce

> 
> You can use this as a reference for the linux-yocto stable kernel bump.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13481): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/13481
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/103659660/21656
Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/leave/6687884/21656/624485779/xyzzy
 [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to