From: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]> I was ready to put this CVE in the ignore pile, since IMHO the reiserfs only continues to exist as a curiousity and possibly as a back compatibility test for the VFS layer. Pretty sure nobody has used it in earnest in the last 15-ish years?
However, the "conflict" was a trivial one in the variable declaration block (from addition of struct timespec64 ctime) and the same "fixed up" commit applies to both v5.15 and v6.1 kernels. So we might as well take the easy ones, I guess. Nothing for v6.6.x as it already has a backport. Build tested only. Obviously zero rush to merge this, given the subject matter and essentially zero user base. It can sit for a month+ if there are other things going on, and nobody will care (including me). Paul. -- Jan Kara (1): reiserfs: Avoid touching renamed directory if parent does not change fs/reiserfs/namei.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13867): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/13867 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/105724660/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
