From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>

If the SDHCI irq is shared with another device then the interrupt
handler can get called while SDHCI is runtime suspended.  That is
harmless but the warning message is not useful so remove it.  Also
returning IRQ_NONE is more appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <ch...@printf.net>
(cherry picked from commit 655bca7616bf6076d30b14d1478bca6807d49c45)
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvh...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 9ddef47..135018e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -2434,9 +2434,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 
        if (host->runtime_suspended) {
                spin_unlock(&host->lock);
-               pr_warning("%s: got irq while runtime suspended\n",
-                      mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
-               return IRQ_HANDLED;
+               return IRQ_NONE;
        }
 
        intmask = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
-- 
1.7.9.5

-- 
_______________________________________________
linux-yocto mailing list
linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto

Reply via email to