On 09/28/2017 07:53 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[[linux-yocto-4.8][PATCH] mm/workingset.c: fix implicit declaration of
__list_lru_init_key] On 22/09/2017 (Fri 15:48) California Sullivan wrote:
__list_lru_init_key does not exist. We're looking for __list_lru_init as
shown in the patch "26690f5 mm: workingset: fix premature shadow node
I don't have that commit ID in mainline. I see this:
That commit ID won't be in mainline - it was a backport patch to 4.8.
commit 0cefabdaf757a6455d75f00cb76874e62703ed18
Author: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Fri Mar 31 15:11:52 2017 -0700
mm: workingset: fix premature shadow node shrinking with cgroups
Did you perhaps rebase or similar? Since the patch below is identical
to the commit above, it is more appropriate to preserve the original
commit log and authorship, as per how nearly all stable backports are
handled.
The patch isn't quite identical: __list_lru_init_key vs list_lru_init_key.
It somehow got mangled in the merge commit 7f56c636.
---
Cal
P.
--
shrinking with cgroups".
Signed-off-by: California Sullivan <california.l.sulli...@intel.com>
---
This is for the standard/preempt-rt/base branch. Standard/base is OK.
mm/workingset.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
index 1856fdb..5e953eb 100644
--- a/mm/workingset.c
+++ b/mm/workingset.c
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ static int __init workingset_init(void)
pr_info("workingset: timestamp_bits=%d max_order=%d bucket_order=%u\n",
timestamp_bits, max_order, bucket_order);
- ret = __list_lru_init_key(&__workingset_shadow_nodes, true, &shadow_nodes_key);
+ ret = __list_lru_init(&__workingset_shadow_nodes, true,
&shadow_nodes_key);
if (ret)
goto err;
ret = register_shrinker(&workingset_shadow_shrinker);
--
2.9.5
--
_______________________________________________
linux-yocto mailing list
linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
