On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Alexander Aring <alex.ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:03:58PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcg...@suse.com>
>>
>> Johannes noted this is not needed, all of the fragment
>> accessors don't need CONFIG_NET_NS. This goes test compiled with
>> CONFIG_BT_6LOWPAN=y and a disabled CONFIG_NET_NS.
>>
>
> a little note about this here. There exists two 6LoWPAN standard. One
> for bluetooth low energy and one for IEEE 802.15.4.
>
> The actual namespace is only for IEEE 802.15.4, because we need
> fragmentation there. 6LoWPAN fragmentation for bluetooth low energy is
> already handled by the MAC-Layer. So this has nothing to do with
> CONFIG_BT_6LOWPAN.

Thanks for the clarification, I actually did mean
CONFIG_IEEE802154_6LOWPAN however, I goofed that on the commit log.

  Luis

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform
Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software
Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready
Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel

Reply via email to