> > Also, if anyone has any ideas about how to better classify the various link > s > > on the links page, or how to better organize the site so that it's easier > > for people to understand and navigate, let me know that also. (As long as > > it doesn't involve HTML frames. I'm not going there with this site.) > > Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU > for NOT using frames, animation, Java, and other useless improvements > that clutter other web sites and make them less navigable.
Take a look at webmin. Can you tell me that a frame across the top with a series of tabs would not be an improvement? I used to be in the anti-frame brigade. When I had a working alternative to webexplorer I figured the technology had become usable to the masses, even important minorities. There are sites that use frames badly, but they can be used well too. A frame across the top of the page can be used to keep navigation aids on-screen. I think that's a good thing. -- Cheers John Summerfield Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/ Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my disposition.
