First we need to find the code in the firmware where this occurs. This might
end up being a non-executable stack. Then we need to make sure that the ipod
is little endian before inputting any code.



On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Taylor Gordon <[email protected]>wrote:

> I don't believe the ipod has an MMU, at least the older ones up to 5.5G
> didn't(davidc__ told me this)
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:05 PM, The Seven <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I haven't heard yet that this ARM even has a MMU...
>> Do you know some details about whether it exists and how it does work?
>>
>> Fabrice Desclaux schrieb:
>>  > just a question:
>> >
>> > It seems ipodlinux doesn't use ARM mmu capabilities.
>> > but are you sure the default apple OS does same?
>> >
>> > because if it uses MMU, your address (0x22000XXX) seems to be PHYSICAL
>> address, and not LINEAR address.
>> > the code (and shell code) will manipulate linear addresses if it is the
>> case.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > +
>> > serpilliere
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:25:01PM +0100, 3mpty wrote:
>> >> 2009/2/17, Bahattin TOZYILMAZ <[email protected]>:
>> >>> Can we code addresses indirectly, create it on a register then use it?
>> >>> It is easy on an x86 but, can it be done on an ARM?
>> >> Yes we can, but not to redirect the flow execution to the shellcode.
>> >>
>> >>> And another question, how will we trigger the shell code?
>> >> If it is a stack based overflow and if the stack isn't marked as non
>> >> exec, we write the shellcode address (more or less, but we have a
>> >> small range of valid addresses (the NOPs)) on the stack, overwriting
>> >> some return address of some function with it.
>> >> (At least this is what I understand from the info given by The Seven
>> >> in the previous email). In this way, after a LDR of PC from the stack,
>> >> instead of the instruction after the function call we'll have our
>> >> shellcode.
>> >>
>> >> Also, things like return-to-libc doesn't seem to be feasible on
>> >> iPod... at least with a black box approach.
>> >> But we should just try.
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>> >> http://www.linux4nano.org
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>> > http://www.linux4nano.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
>> http://www.linux4nano.org
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux4nano-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
http://www.linux4nano.org

Reply via email to