Hi Carey,
Sounds good, then. If glib doesn't require X/gnome/GTK, and it may
tn5250 smaller, then I'm all for it. :)
In fact, I may look into using it in my own projects...
Thanks for the reply.
On 25 May 2000, Carey Evans wrote:
>
> > I use tn5250 on a couple of machines that are just too old and slow to
> > run X (486sx-25 & slower, 8mb RAM). If glib became a requirement, would I
> > then need to have X installed on these machines?
>
> glib has nothing to do with X. It's just some useful abstract types
> and utility functions for C that have been combined in one place for
> Gtk and Gnome to use.
>
> > Also, its been discussed many times that it'd be nice to have a "emulator
> > on a floppy" wouldn't the extra size of glib make this impossible?
>
> If you statically link with glib, you'll get only the functions you're
> using. The tn5250 code itself would probably get slightly smaller.
>
> I think using glib would be a plus where it's appropriate for us.
>
+---
| This is the LINUX5250 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To subscribe to this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+---
