This patch doesn't appear to work. I did a rm -r tn5250, then a fresh checkout from CVS. When I try to run the patch I get this:
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -u --recursive tn5250-cvs-20020313/src/scs2pdf.c tn5250/src/scs2pdf.c |--- tn5250-cvs-20020313/src/scs2pdf.c Wed Mar 13 19:43:11 2002 |+++ tn5250/src/scs2pdf.c Wed Mar 13 19:43:28 2002 -------------------------- Patching file tn5250/src/scs2pdf.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 41. Hunk #2 failed at 81. Hunk #3 failed at 119. Hunk #4 failed at 163. Hunk #5 failed at 183. Hunk #6 failed at 227. Hunk #7 failed at 251. Hunk #8 failed at 282. Hunk #9 failed at 305. Hunk #10 failed at 350. Hunk #11 failed at 365. Hunk #12 failed at 380. Hunk #13 failed at 392. Hunk #14 failed at 402. Hunk #15 failed at 482. Hunk #16 failed at 492. Hunk #17 failed at 557. Hunk #18 failed at 596. Hunk #19 failed at 622. 19 out of 19 hunks failed--saving rejects to tn5250/src/scs2pdf.c.rej done Could you try applying your patch to a fresh checkout, and see if it works for you? On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, James Rich wrote: > I removed some redundant code in scs2pdf.c and added comments to it to > explain how it works. I wanted to get this done before I got started on > changing it to use the function pointers and structures that Scott has > been talking about. This way we should have something nice and clean (and > working) before I go and break everything :) > > Get the patch at: > > http://www.eaerich.com/tn5250.diff > > It applies against current cvs. > > James Rich > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list To post a message email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/linux5250 or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.
