Sorry, didn't meant to upset people. I'm new and was planning on attending meetings and wondered if there was something other that the existing website.
In IBM DevOps, we use slack as a valuable tool to not just send emoticons but plug into a host of collaborative tools to share ideas, help one another via group web conferencing, screen sharing and much much more. Figured a tool like slack might spark up some buzz in the group as there are many Dev's who use Linux in mixed environments for many different purposes, not just a single o/s, all open environment. Some days I do wish our world was like that though, it would certainly make things easier in some ways. Thanks for the IRC info. Cheers. Jeff On 2019-11-09 9:38 a.m., Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 2019-11-09 08:52, Dianne Skoll wrote: >> On 11/9/19 6:10 AM, Jeff Green wrote: >>> Is there a Slack Channel for the group? If not, would there be interest >>> in making one? >> There is an IRC channel: #oclug on OFTC.NET >> >> https://webchat.oftc.net/?nick=WHATEVER&channels=%23oclug&uio=d4 > There have been over a dozen people on that channel for at least 17 > years. > >> I'm now going to go on a rant. :) > I think I can hear what is coming and am guessing I fully agree. I was > going to just ignore the original suggestion of slack as off-topic, but > since someone else has weighed in, I'll jump in too now. > >> I would not be interested in a Slack channel. IRC is open-source with >> an open protocol; Slack is closed-source with a closed protocol. I >> don't think OCLUG should be in the business of promoting closed source >> or closed protocols. > Absolutely 100% agree. Same reason I don't have any use for other > corporate walled gardens such as Skype, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, > etc... I have dabbled a tiny bit in Twitter, but Mastodon is an open > alternative if I felt the need to communicate with 140 character > limits. The only one I've used with any frequency is LinkedIn, which > has now been acquired by Microsoft. > >> Slack has discontinued options for using open protocols. >> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/03/09/slack_cuts_ties_to_irc_and_xmpp/ >> >> You can't log in to Slack as more than one user at a time. This is >> particularly annoying if you have a work Slack channel and also want >> personal Slack channels open at the same time. This is not an issue with >> IRC clients. >> >> I mean, sure, you can't easily send an animated GIF of a cat chasing a laser >> pointer over IRC, but to me the lack of bullshit like that is a good thing! > However, this is possible with XMPP, and while I do like the simple > nature of text, I'd be willing to entertain some possibility to enable > this in an open way. G+ did use XMPP, but they had extended it and > eventually killed it. > >> End rant. > rant++ > >> Regards, >> >> Dianne. > slainte mhath, RGB > > -- > Richard Guy Briggs -- ~\ -- ~\ > <hpv.tricolour.ca> > <www.TriColour.ca> -- \___ o \@ @ Ride yer > bike! > Ottawa, ON, CANADA -- Lo_>__M__\\/\%__\\/\% > Vote! -- > <greenparty.ca>_____GTVS6#790__(*)__(*)________(*)(*)_________________ > > To unsubscribe send a blank message to linux+unsubscr...@linux-ottawa.org > To get help send a blank message to linux+h...@linux-ottawa.org > To visit the archives: https://lists.linux-ottawa.org > To unsubscribe send a blank message to linux+unsubscr...@linux-ottawa.org To get help send a blank message to linux+h...@linux-ottawa.org To visit the archives: https://lists.linux-ottawa.org
