Windows boot managers have some limitations you should be aware of, and I would not call them "fully featured" if you want to run Linux as one of the choices. There is a good explanation of all this at http://www.optimizingpc.com/install/multiboot_bootmanager.html
Personally, I would stick with GRUB, even on a disk where you want to run various versions of Windows and no Linux at all. David --- In [email protected], "Paul" <pfrederi...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "dbneeley" <dbneeley@> wrote: > > > > Windows XP and later actually has its own boot loader. > > Hey that is great news but as I understand it even MS-DOS came with a boot > loader. Do you mean a fully featured Boot Manager by chance? > > My knowledge of Microsoft products ends abruptly in 1996 when I began running > GNU/Linux full time. Which had the side effect of sparing me of a lot of the > eXPerience. > > Sometimes ignorance really is bliss ... > > Paul > ------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, please email [email protected] & you will be removed.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LINUX_Newbies/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LINUX_Newbies/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
