On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 05:25, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Ronald G. Minnich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Eric, how much heartburn is there if we set the default value of > > CONFIG_COMPRESS to 0? > > > > I've just hit another platform where it is trouble. At this point I > > believe there are only a small number of platforms for which it works well > > if set to 1. Do you have any issues if we have it default to 0, not 1, so > > it is only enabled on platforms it is "known good" on? > > My gut reaction says to keep the default as is, and just change it for known > problem boards. > > Long term we want memory at 0xf0000. > > In addition we have another way to solve this problem. Write the code to assign > irqs, given a pirq table. And that is something long term we need to do as well. >
If the problem only occurs for IRQ table, why do we copy them to EBDA instead of 0xf0000 ?? Is the 639kB used for other purpose ?? Ollie _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
