You really should check out darcs. I did an extensive arch/darcs comparison, and the XWT project (xwt.org) is going with the latter. Vastly simpler than either bk or arch but with all the same features.
- a [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > This is just a heads up. I have been doing some investigation > into distributed version control systems. arch looks like it > usable and getting more usable. > > >From the design standpoint I don't see any big issues and > it appears to be the equal of bk etc. I think I see some > was to make it simpler and more powerful but that is not needed to > make a good revision control system. > > I need to do a little more testing to see what arch is actually like > to use. Before I seriously start advocating anything but I'm not > expecting any weird issues to crop up. Except possibly for some > issues running under cygwin, for the platform challenged. > > Once my evaluation is finished I plan on pushing the projects I work > on in that direction. So this is something to think about. > > Eric > _______________________________________________ > Linuxbios mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios > -- "If Darl McBride [the CEO of SCO, who claims the GPL 'destroys intellectual property'] was in charge, he'd probably make marriage unconstitutional too, since clearly it de-emphasizes the commercial nature of normal human interaction, and probably is a major impediment to the commercial growth of prostitution" -- Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
