On 6 Mar 2001, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> > makes sense. So my old theory about the kernel covering you were
> > wrong. This sounds like a needed enhancement to page zero in kernels --
> > making sure it's write-only.
>
> Hmm.  I thought page zero was already read-only, but how that is
> relevant currently escapes me.


my typo. I meant to say 'page zeroing code'.

ron

Reply via email to