Hi, On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:23:34PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> gpl v2. Let's avoid "or later" until that controversy is resolved. > > > > I don't see a problem with "v2 or later". Everybody who doesn't > > like to > > use GPLv3 (when it's released) can just chose to use v2. That's > > perfectly legal. > > FWIW, no one but the original author(s) can decide to re-license > "v2 only" code to "v2 or later"
Correct. I'm notsaying to change the license of other people's code (because that's simply not possible). Only the respective copyright owner can change the license. Uwe. -- Uwe Hermann http://www.hermann-uwe.de http://www.it-services-uh.de | http://www.crazy-hacks.org http://www.holsham-traders.de | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
