>> Well it would be really weird to sign-off on a patch that >> you don't agree with, so acked-by is quite redundant if you >> already signed off on a patch. > > I posted an example a few days ago. I see a patch on the list, > take it, modify it to improve _some_ parts of it, but it's still > not "finished" and I'm still don't agree that it should be committed. > But at least it's a bit better now. > > In such a case I'd say I should sign-off (as I modified the patch), but > I don't want to Ack it.
But you don't check it in yet either. The "ack" that we require is only for pushing stuff into the repo. Segher -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
