On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:03:00PM -0400, Richard Smith wrote: > >>I'm not sure. I recently tested another 440BX board using the v1 code > >>(Tyan S1846). It got to the point where it says "ELF loader by Eric > >>Biederman" (or so). That looks like the RAM init passed just fine, > >>right? Can somebody confirm that? > > I _know_ V1 used to work. I had a product at Bitworks based on it. At > least it worked for the Bitworks IMS board. If you pull V1 to test then > I recommend that you use older gcc's and tweak the makefile to use them. > I think you may need to use gcc-2.95 or gcc 3.3
Do you think that makes a difference? I used gcc 4.1.2. I had to fix the code a bit to make it compile, but it _did_ compile. Apart from that, is there another reason to use an older compiler? Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
