* Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070619 10:36]:
> > Yes. ADLO.
>
> OK, so we'll have to take care about that.
>
> Which settings does ADLO require/expect?
so far ADLO has to do it all on its own, since it has to change those
settings during its runtime.
> Do we have or want a general LinuxBIOS-wide policy as to how to set the
> PAM registers? Or is this chipset-/mainboard-specific?
We need an interface to ADLO, preferably an LB table entry describing
how ADLO can change the settings.
Or we make 0xf0000-0xfffff writable and hope nobody will mess with it.
No idea whether that works reliably
> IMO we should make sure that ADLO can be used on _all_ boards. It's no
> problem to have a config option and a reasonable default, but there
> should definately be a possibility for the "end user" to easily use ADLO
> without having to touch the source code.
Yes. The problem with ADLO seems to be it is not even capable of booting
Windows 2000 in Qemu+LBv2 yet. So progress is sneaking
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://www.coresystems.de/
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
