On 6/25/07, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we handle this differently currently (and that works fine > so far) -- we should not include include/arch/x86/arch/lib.h > in include/lib.h, but rather change the Makefile to add the > include/arch/x86 path to the includes. > > The only drawback is that we cannot have files with the same name > in include/arch/FOO/arch/ and include/ (but that's already the case > for the current files).
Right, I did this arch/lib.h thing in response to a request; people did not like arch/x86/lib.h in includes. I personally like it, as it reduces "magic". I would rather NOT have the arch directory, and i would rather NOT have duplicate names like lib.h. So, quick, somebody, make a suggestion. Where do we put cpu-dependent library functions? cpu.h? ron -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
