* Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070630 17:17]:
> Bring the file cpu.h in sync with the current version of the code in
> the Linux kernel (as far as possible). The code is a lot simpler
> and shorter now.
> 
> Also, add cpu_relax() (which is also part of the Linux file) which
> could be useful for busy-loops (but is currently not used).
> Drop the cpu_relax() from spinlock.h as it's not spinlock related in any way.
> 
> The code builds, but is otherwise untested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
Can you test with qemu?

Otherwise
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
      Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  • http://www.coresystems.de/

-- 
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Reply via email to