On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:23, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > * Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070712 15:06]: > > Hm, but given your above explanations that the hlt() may not really > > completely halt, I'd say that we really should move the loop into > > hlt(). When I call hlt() from my code I _expect_ a full halt, I don't > > want _any_ other code exectuted. > > It's hlt, not halt. This is the instruction that used to be > called in the idle loop to make the cpu _sleep_ until new work occurs.
When no interrupt, reset, NMI or SMI occures the "hlt" opcode let the CPU sleep forever. Do we are using interrupts in LBv3? Juergen -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
