On 8/23/07, Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:28:04PM +0700, Darmawan Salihun wrote: > > However, it seems to be the patch will stay as different file > > because among all of the flashchip support files, there's no > > one of them that can provide the register unprotect routine(s). > > The idea is to keep code duplication to a minimum where possible, so > if W39V are quite similar to another already-supported chip except > for these registers it may be a good idea to just add the neccessary > register stuff to that chip code instead. (But only called for W39V, > of course.) >
Done. During testing I found that W39V040FA doesn't seem supporting per-sector erase. As other SST Firmware Hub chips. Therefore, I add the code to give erase support for the chip. See patch. Regards, Darmawan Salihun -------------------------------------------------------------------- -= Human knowledge belongs to the world =-
flashrom_w39v040fa_fix.patch
Description: Binary data
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
