* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070829 11:39]:
> Quoting Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I personally think we need to support more newer hardware in shorter
> > time to gain the momentum so LinuxBIOS can become the default firmware
> > on new mainboards that you buy. We can make this goal, and it has been
> > done in some cases. It's just a long way, as it was for Linux, too.
>
> That would be _REALLY_ great but is this realistic?..
It is the only realistic scenario for LinuxBIOS becoming wide-spread
and, no doubt, we have been pretty successful so far. More than one
million computers out there are running LinuxBIOS. This is a far higher
number than a usual charge of mainboards produced by a manufacturer in a
series.
Unlike Linux, LinuxBIOS can not be "just tried with a live CD" or
something. So either it gets pre-installed or it will be something only
technically skilled people will ever use.
> Maybe this is sligtly off topic here (and a little bit paranoid..), but when
> one
> consider the fact that "trusted computing" becomes more and more prevalent in
> new systems (mandatory soon maybe?!), doesn't this outright kill the LB
> project?
The opposite is the case. LinuxBIOS is the _only_ chance out there that
allows controlling the restrictions. It does not restrict the vendor in
controlling the "bootblock" -- Since there is no such thing as the
bootblock in LinuxBIOSv2, I wonder what the technical meaning of that
part of the specification is supposed to be.
Stefan
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://www.coresystems.de/
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
