On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:55:30AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > Peter Stuge wrote: > >> + archive.start =(void *)(0UL-archive.len); > >> > > > > Is 0UL good also on 64bit? (Even if it's truncated and "saved" when > > assigned to archive.start I'd prefer having the size explicitly.) > > > There will not be a 64bit version of the above code within the next > decade. But who says never ;)
My point was that if this is built on amd64 0UL is 64 bit, right? But archive.start is u32 - and we should be more explicit about what we want to accomplish. //Peter -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
