Ward Vandewege schrieb: > Now; before I post my patches to the list for review, I'd like to know what > the current thinking is on the future of buildrom. > > There are a couple of issues with buildrom as it stands today: > > a) it's v2 only > b) there is no standardized way to use a different initrd 'skeleton' for a > specific board > c) there is no standardized way to have different LinuxBIOS Config.lb files > for a > particular board, based on the payload > > Thoughts? Does that sound reasonable? >
my view: whatever gets us closer to a feasible live-Linux-CDROM that is bootable on GA M57-SLI as well as ASUS A8N-E (the desktop flagships 30 - 80€ in cost) and has binaries to flash on those targets is well supportable. we need binaries for early adopters to download and flash into their mobos and save that in wiki. --Q -- New Mexico: it's not new, and it isn't it Mexico. The Fed: "There is nothing federal about the federal reserve system, and there are no reserves." (Prof. Bill Still) -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios