On 9/26/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, this patch is not for the weak of hart because it touches some logic > we had lots of problems with in the past. > Basically, the lar archive header walk will not see a header at the end > of the archive if nothing is after that header. However, since a file > with zero size is a legal lar member, we really can't forbid to look at > a header terminating the archive.
I need to be convinced that there is any value if having a header for a zero-length file at the very end of the archive. I think this is way more capability than we need, and I am very paranoid about LAR, given the subtle bugs that we have had. Otherwise, I would rather not commit this. thanks ron -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
