On 10/7/07, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > while the patch is correct I won't apply it for now. I have a much > bigger patch in the works which does what your patch does, and adds > a lots more other (duplicate) IDs for chips with different name...
sure. > > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:02:10PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > > > In general, can I assume that two chips with the same id number > > > will have the exact same register layout? > > > > No, I don't think that is safe. > > True. > > There are several chips with different names and same IDs. Fair enough. Now that being said, how should I enter data for two chips into the array? Should it just look like the following? {0x50, "First chip name" ...} {0x50, "Second chip name" ...} > > > > > Also, what are "Ultra I/Os", and should superiotool support dumps > > > from 'em? > > > > Sorry, no idea. > > Can you name an example? I think that's just another name for Super I/O, > so yes, I think we should support them. Sure -- the SMSC datasheet website lists several Super I/Os and at least one "Ultra I/O": http://www.smsc.com/main/datasheet.html "FDC37C93x FDC37C93x Plug-and-Play Compatible Ultra I/O Controller 639k 3/21/07" -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios