I have programming guides and older boards, but aren't the 965 and 964 getting old?
How about focusing on new boards with the 968? For example: http://www.foxconnchannel.com/product/Motherboards/detail_spec.aspx?ID=en-us0000336 AM2 + 761GX + 968 -Bari Morgan Tsai /SiS wrote: > Dear Uwe, > > Sorry for there is no errata sheet. Maybe I can add more PCI IDs > for our chipset first. I can provide some recommend setting written > at internal document, if needed. > > > > Morgan > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Uwe Hermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Morgan Tsai /SiS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "bari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Corey Osgood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <linuxbios@linuxbios.org> > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 2:10 AM > Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] Walmart/Everex GPC TC2502 (VIA CN700 > +VT8237RChipset), PC2500E > > Hi Morgan! > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:52:19AM +0800, Morgan Tsai /SiS wrote: >> SiS965(L) vs 966(L) >> >> Identical device ID: LAN, USB >> Different device ID: SATA, Audio(966 has HD Audio, but still reserved >> AC97) >> >> Although they are funtionally alike, such like register map. >> There is somewhare different value to be filled for bug fix. > > That doesn't sound too bad, IMHO. If the only real differences are PCI > IDs of some devices and small changes in some registers, then the 966(L) > code could easily be adapted to also work with 965(L), correct? > > Adding more PCI IDs is trivial and we can do that without datasheet > access I think, but the "different value to be filled for bug fix" > could be a problem if it's not documented publically... > > Is there some errata sheet we can look at and/or do you know how to fix > the 966(L) code in svn to make it work for 965(L), too? > > > Thanks, Uwe. -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
