Jordan Crouse wrote: > On 16/11/07 14:58 -0800, Steve Isaacs wrote: > > Jordan Crouse wrote: > >> Well, first and foremost, because the tiny kernel already knows how to > >> do > > > > I'm sorry, can someone enlighten me as to what a "tiny kernel" is? Is > > that anything similar to this? http://www.selenic.com/linux-tiny/ > > Well, typically, its any kernel that is small enough to fit on the ROM, > with small filesystem to accompany it. And strangely enough, many > people do use the linux-tiny patches to help make said kernel small > enough.
The problem with the current tiny-kernel approach is that, it can't get nearly as tiny as filo. And when you have legacy systems like i440bx with only 256kb flash, then tiny-kernel becomes a definite no go, which make filo the only viable solution. What we really need is a stripped down tiny-kernel. IOW, a single-proc kernel-stub with its sole purpose to provide access to the large linux driver pool. Later, this could conceivably be inlined with the LinuxBIOS code-base, making LinuxBIOS really a BIOS that makes use of linux. Thanks! -- Al -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios