On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:26:23PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > * Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071127 18:01]: > > Yes. How about: > > old way: normal/stage2.o/segment0 normal/stage2.o/segment1 > > new 1: normal/stage2/seg0 normal/stage2/seg1 > > new 2: normal/stage2/0 normal/stage2/1 > > > > I prefer having seg in the name to make it obvious that these are > > segments. > > Then just leave the name segment. It doesn't significantly safe space to > abbreviate here. I like dropping .o in the name though.
ACK for both. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
