On 02.12.2007 00:34, Andreas B. Mundt wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 10:11:36AM +0100, Andreas B. Mundt wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> building a LAB-image with buildrom (I had to do this on an other >> 32-bit machine) flashing now works for me, too. I tried to find out >> why, but so far without success. Some configuration might differ? >> > > > > > Hey, > > I found the difference in the builds: > > =================================================================== > --- src/mainboard/gigabyte/m57sli/Config.lb (revision 2994) > +++ src/mainboard/gigabyte/m57sli/Config.lb (working copy) > @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ > # SIO pin set 1 input mode > #irq 0xc8 = > 0x0 > # SIO pin set 2 mixed input/output > mode > - irq 0xc9 = > 0x40 > + irq 0xc9 = 0x0 > # SIO pin set 4 input mode > #irq 0xcb = > 0x0 > # Generate SMI# on EC IRQ > > > This has been changed in rev 2972. Buildrom has still the 'old' > version. Flashing works fine for me if irq 0xc9 = 0x0 is set. With irq > 0xc9 = 0x40 it fails. >
OK, is that a difference between board revisions, BIOS revisions or just a misinterpretation of some superiotool dump? I can see that your latest superiotool dump with the proprietary BIOS has irq 0xc9 = 0x40 set. I tried to mirror that. Now the interesting question is: Why does that setting not work for you? > Could somebody check if flashing really works for some m57sli-boards > (LPC) with the latest revision (irq 0xc9 = 0x40)? To track this down, I need: * superiotool dump of proprietary BIOS for board revisions 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 2.x * the exact BIOS version of the proprietary BIOS. It seems that Ward's board also has 0xc9 = 0x40 set. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios