> -----Original Message----- > From: Jordan Crouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 4:47 PM > To: Myles Watson > Cc: linuxbios@linuxbios.org > Subject: Re: Expand linuxbiosv3 support > > On 06/12/07 16:32 -0700, Myles Watson wrote: > > It complains that the logs directory doesn't exist when it tries to > fetch > > and create the linuxbiosv3/logs/fetch.log file. > > oops - my bad - I can fix that. > > > I prefer to have LinuxBIOSv2 and LinuxBIOSv3 represented in the same > way. I > > think it's confusing to have one be LBV3 and one LINUXBIOS. It seems > like > > LINUXBIOS should be used in the generic case, and things that are > specific > > to v2 or v3 should be labeled that way. > > The problem is that v2 and v3 are way too different - so regardless of > the nomenclature, you're going to need to have ifeq statements everywhere, > and I personally think that is messier then having different variables > names. If you want, we _can_ reuse the variables since we're only > including > either the v2 or the v3 .mk file, but to me that makes things more > confusing > to the person porting the platform.
I was just voting for the variables to look the same if they were the same. (LINUXBIOS_V2_BUILD_DIR and LINUXBIOS_V3_BUILD_DIR or LBV2_BUILD_DIR and LBV3_BUILD_DIR) I wasn't complaining about the separation. Myles -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
