On 31.12.2007 00:57, Corey Osgood wrote: > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >> On 30.12.2007 13:15, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> >> >>> On 30.12.2007 05:40, Corey Osgood wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> doesn't seem quite right, but it might be (yes, I realize it means 4x >>>> more IDs). We also break the ability to use IMT flash chips (which >>>> someone may, eventually...). The other things is, if it should be a >>>> while loop, why isn't it? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Oh, I had not seen the IMT entry in flash.h. It is obviously wrong. With >>> the current code, at least EON and IMT will collide, and neither have a >>> real vendor ID of 0x7f. I'll dig out the real IMT vendor ID. >>> >>> >>> >> Patch to fix the IMT entry sent to the list. I hope this addresses your >> concerns. >> >> Regards, >> Carl-Daniel >> > > In that case: > > Acked-by: Corey Osgood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
Thanks, r3030. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
