Myles Watson wrote: >> Author: jcrouse >> Date: 2008-01-11 19:23:47 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) >> New Revision: 3046 >> >> Modified: >> trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/buildtarget >> Log: >> Add the ability to extend CFLAGS as needed for several new distros >> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Acked-by: Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Acked-by: Jordan Crouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >> Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/buildtarget >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/buildtarget 2008-01-11 00:32:07 UTC (rev >> 3045) >> +++ trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/buildtarget 2008-01-11 18:23:47 UTC (rev >> 3046) >> @@ -53,4 +53,25 @@ >> export PYTHONPATH=$config_dir >> $PYTHON $config_py $config_lb $lbpath >> >> +# now start checking for distro-specific breakage. >> +## This check is for the no stack protector mess. >> +EXTRA_CFLAGS= >> + >> +if [ -z "$CC" ]; then >> + CC=gcc >> +fi >> + >> +$CC -fno-stack-protector -S -xc /dev/null -o .$$.tmp >> + >> +if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then >> + EXTRA_CFLAGS=-fno-stack-protector >> +fi >> > > This adds the flag for me, even though I didn't need it. Was that intended? > > Myles I don't think it matters, if your gcc wasn't compiled to do stack checking it'll just ignore it. But I think it breaks gcc 3.x, do we care? IMHO, no.
-Corey -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
