Quoting Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:54:18PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote: >> > Peter Stuge wrote: >> > > I think we need to make it configurable. >> > >> > I don't like that. With a factory bios, you expect the correct >> > microcode update for your CPU to be present, no matter what CPU you >> > put in a socket. >> >> (Actually no, not always.) >> >> >> > We should be able to do the same. >> >> I agree, but we should also try to be even more flexible. I think we >> should allow inclusion of 0<=n<=all microcode updates. Definately an >> advanced option, but still. > > Yep, that's what I meant. It's fine if the default is "all microcode > updates", but there should be an option for advanced users to only use > the one(s) you really want or need in order to save time and space. > > > Uwe. > That makes perfect sense.....I like the advanced option idea:-)
Thanks - Joe -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios