Brian Stephenson wrote:
>
> > Ron said:
> > I think this is timing.
>
> definitely, I tried 2 flash chips with 90nsec access time,
> the AMD worked, the SST didn't, probably tighter tolerences
> at AMD, place a delay between writes and all is OK on both.
>
> The DoC seems to handle writes with no problems (which had
> me stumped, why DoC and not flash) I wonder what the access
> times are for it??
>
> I was thinking of building a site dedicated to the SIS chips, only.
> All information that has flowed thru the mailing lists and from
> the manuals in regards to linuxBIOS presented in easy to read,
> informative way (eg MTRR stuff, cache DoC, flash, anything of
> interest), the target, Windows users, they love the DoC
> in place of the BIOS and want low level information, it turns
> them on. Hey, who would pay $70 for a program that raises
> the MTU and MRU from 296 up to 1500 in ppp, these guys
> think nothing of paying $95 for a DoC. (Australian $$)
>
> Anyway any objections from SiS or ACL??
>
> Regards
> Brian
We are welcomed to do so. We always need somebody doing the PR for us.
Ollie
