> > well we can name it anything. The problem is openbios is taken. Since the > source tree is called freebios we could call it that but the problem is > name changes are really hard to propagate once they "take". I'll wait for > other comments. > My suggestion was just that the initialization code, I think, has applicability beyond Linux as TIARA has shown. Continuing to call it LinuxBIOS may or may not be a good thing. There are pro's and con's for both. I also think that the developers (which don't include myself at this point) should rename it, if they decide to do so. I proposed names only as part of an example. Bill
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Larry Linde
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Ollie Lho
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Ollie Lho
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Ronald G Minnich
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Eric W. Biederman
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Ollie Lho
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Ronald G Minnich
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Eric W. Biederman
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Bill Arbaugh
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Ronald G Minnich
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Bill Arbaugh
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Adam Agnew
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Adam Agnew
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Ollie Lho
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Ollie Lho
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Eric W. Biederman
- Proper Device initialization. Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Proper Device initialization. Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Proper Device initialization. Eric W. Biederman
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Ollie Lho
- Re: UTC Boot (TIARA) Eric W. Biederman
