From: Nikolai Vladychevski
> but if we reverse-engineer it , we still wouldn't be allowed to
> put it in a source code, I'm right? If so, reversing stuff that
> we already know would be very easy....
Ronald(?) signed the NDA, and the AMD knowledge he used to write
that bit of code is covered by the NDA. So Ronald (or anyone else
who had access to the AMD documentation under NDA) cannot legally
make that bit of information publically available.
On the other hand - if someone who did *not* sign an NDA with AMD
could figure out how to write that code, then they would have met
the legal definition of reverse engineering, and are not prevented
from making that same information public.
> this is horrible........ I will not leave AMD, I will keep going
> on it... I don't care about this NDA stupidity, if the reverse
> engineering will be needed, I'll do it.
Go for it! :)
Of course, the ideal would be to get AMD unhinder this bit of code...
