This is good news. I plan on using the amptron board of the same model number that seems to be the same thing. How much of the critical votages do these boards draw with a an athlon and perhaps a DOC or CF? I ran one on a 150 watt PS for 24 hours with no drives. Dont have the specs handy for the PS but it's the enlight MATX case. I'ld like to use a similar PS in a custom rack mount case using athlons but I'm afraid the +5 or +3.3 supplied wont be enough.
GO On Friday 02 November 2001 15:19, Ronald G Minnich wrote: > K7 support for the PC Chips m810LMR is now back. I have just committed it. > Here are sample messages for bootup for the supported SDRAM configurations. > > PCCHIPS M810LMR (and similar)...Fixing mainboard for dimms 256K + 256K > Fixing DIMMS with 2x256 > PCCHIPS M810LMR (and similar)...Fixing mainboard for dimms 256K + 0K > Fixing DIMMS with 1x256 > PCCHIPS M810LMR (and similar)...Fixing mainboard for dimms 256K + 128K > Fixing DIMMS with 256+128 > PCCHIPS M810LMR (and similar)...Fixing mainboard for dimms 128K + 128K > Fixing DIMMS with 2x128 > PCCHIPS M810LMR (and similar)...Fixing mainboard for dimms 128K + 0K > Fixing DIMMS with 1x128 > PCCHIPS M810LMR (and similar)...Fixing mainboard for dimms 128K + 256K > Fixing DIMMS with 128+256 > > In case anybody is worried about any NDA issues with the code, see two > things: First, how we did it: see freebios/util/k7msr for an overview. All > this was worked out from a user-mode Linux program, and tested from a > similar user-mode Linux program. That code was then ported into LinuxBIOS. > > Second, a note in the code: > > // see the explanation in freebios/util/k7msr for how this code was > // created. Short form: NO NDA material was used to create this code. > // Go sue somebody else. > > So SiS 730 users: you are now back on the air. I really like these K7+730 > combos. Peppy! > > Only remaining problem: from 2.4.3. to 2.4.7 something broke on both 630 > and 730 support for X; it no longer works on 2.4.7. > > Ron
