* ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051123 05:55]: > oh, wow, what a mess. There's a lot to fix still. We'll be looking at each of > these in turn, to try to get them to build. The last batch of patches from > people left the tree in a very unhealthy state. > > We're going to have to watch this a lot more closely. If we can't improve the > situation somehow, the only thing I can think of to do is limit people to > sending in patches via the issue tracker, and shrinking the set of people who > can commit down to a very small circle. Based on what I'm seeing here, the > current setup is not working. I have not wanted to do this as we here at LANL > don't have tons of free time to monitor patches, but the current situation can > not continue. > > I think the earlier suggestion, of requiring positive evidence that abuild > works after a patch, might be right. only problem -- abulid is making > mistakes. > The digital logic msm586 bulid fails in abuild, and works fine otherwise. > oops.
This is mostly because abuild assumes a certain image size while some of the builds break if you choose a too small or too big image. IIRC the DL MSM586 breaks because it doesn't build with 512k rom images. Stefan -- LinuxBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
