> > > weird. gcc 3.3.5 from SUSE 9.3 and gcc 4.0.2 from SUSE 10 work fine. You > should definitely avoid using gcc 2.96 when possible.
Unfortanetly, with gcc 2.96 I'm not able to compile the LB image itself :D Furthermore, I work on a selfmade minimal distro, but I will try to compile a working gcc version to compile both, flashtool and the image without any warnings Currently I'm wondering about the differences in gcc. For flashtool I get warnings for comparisons between signed and unsigned only, without the -Werror Flag and the gcc 3.3 version. Why isn't gcc backwards compatible? Now I have the tool compiled with gcc 2.96 and it works, but compiling the image with gcc 3.3 results in the same warnings and a few warnings more. It could be, that the image won't work :( However, I will test the results the next days and stay tuned :D > > regards chris @Stefan I think i can mail to in german, is it so ?? -- LinuxBIOS mailing list LinuxBIOS@openbios.org http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios