On Tuesday 27 June 2006 13:35, jtd wrote: > If u are refering to qos bits in the tcp header lets hope it stays > that way. The network must stay packet neutral and hence service > neutral. Otherwise you will be shelling out even more for much less. > ISPs would (they arlready are) start charging premiums for > infrastucture usage funded esentially by public wealth (money earned > by grant of monopoly on spectrum and restrictions on free flow of > Indian and foreign money)
Well no I wasn't really referring to the QoS bits. I was referring to the Quality of Service provided by MTNL. It has miles to go before they can really call it a service. For most its just a headache. -- Regards, Dinesh A. Joshi -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
