On Thursday 29 June 2006 03:29 pm, Philip Tellis wrote:
> Sometime Today, j cobbled together some glyphs to say:
> > rather than being compatible with some browsers. However the W3C
> > standards are patent encumbered afaik.
>
> patents in themselves are not bad.  when utilised for evil, that's
> when they become bad.

Agreed. Save the major problem of software and "fake" patents. I was 
referring strictly to software patents.
>
> Bad uses of patents:
> - Stifle innovation
> - Prevent competition
>
> Good uses of patents:
> - Protect small time inventors
> - Protect a standard from being embraced and extended

With the current patent system doing exactly the opposite of the 
above.
 
>
> jtd, you need to learn not to create stereotypes for everything.  A
> little knowledge is dangerous if you believe in it as fact.  I'm
> sure you'll agree with me, that given the last point, and how we've
> suffered from it in the past, that this is a Good Thing.

Not quite. The W3C's acceptance of patent encumbered standards is 
fraught with danger, by exposing developers to legal action. U would 
be wasting time and money applying for permission to the patent 
holder then whetting the permissions thru a legal channels.

> Read the policy here:
> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/
>
> You'll understand that the primary reason for this policy is so
> that the W3C standards are completely unencumbered with non-free
> clauses that make it unusable by the general public.  It's sort of
> a GPL for standards and specifications.
>

Patenting software is a very bad idea. W3C cloaks this stupiity with 
fancy words RAND and RF. Although W3C states that the standards are 
Royalty free and available on RAND terms, it effectively adds a thick 
legal layer precluding individuals / organisations  from creating 
standards compliant systems without going thru a legal and technical 
whetting of the patent. This is imo completely unneccessary for any 
standard and in particular relating to software. 

-- 
Rgds
JTD

-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to