Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
Can some one please point out the clause under which a license can be
revoked (unless the license clause is violated).
there is no clause saying it can be revoked - by definition the
copyright holder can revoke the license unless
1. there is a clause saying it is irrevocable
2. the license has been paid for
1. By principle of natural justice should it not be reverse? There
should be a clause saying the license can be revoked under these conditions.
2. Is it not a contradiction. The license is based on the "principle of
freedom", so there is also a clause saying you can charge for the
software, but that is mentioned because it is a exception to the principle.
When you say "paid for" is the consideration only financial? Does not
your agreeing to the principle of freedom be taken as your payment?
Thanks and regards.
sadhu
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
