On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:54:03 +0530, Dinesh Joshi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 13:43 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:47:02 +0530, Dinesh Joshi
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: What is broken in my mailer?
> Do you see my mail client quoting your email address in this
> public-mailing-list-which-gets-published-all-over-the-internet?
Yup. That is not broken behaviour; it is creating an
attribution exactly as it was designed to do.
>> I did read the part where you tried to explain how your insults
>> were all a joke, tee-hee. I found it less than compelling.
> Whatever...you're being an idiot if you think i insulted
^^^^^
> anything. As I said earlier I wont be explaining.
Nice.
>> I have no idea who thought of Linux, and the brethren free BSD
>> based UNIX operating systems as a Toy. The circles I move in, the
>> phrase is used to describe Windows, and not UNIX and clones.
> Uh....you're kidding, right? Ever heard of Steve Ballmer? Bill
> Gates? Hello??? Microsoft? Rest of the world?
So they think UNIX, which they tried so hard to copy, is a
Toy? And while they might be entitled to their opinion, and think
Linux is a Toy, I, and the people I work/play with, continue to think
their efforts created a Toy OS that shall never come close to our
work spaces.
>> I suppose I must be one of those who has a poor understanding of
>> Linux and operating systems in general. I am looking forward to
>> being enlightened.
> I have better things to do :)
A pity. I could have learned so so very much.
manoj
--
Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the
only specification is that it should run noiselessly.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
