> > Aaah ... I see now that my last point was wrong. Clearly, the actual license > of QT is the final word. Seems like the web-site has just been tuned to > exhort commercial companies to purchase the "commercial" license. No more > qualms on this issue ... thanks. > It is *NOT* QT , it is Qt.
Kushal -- http://fedoraproject.org http://kushaldas.in -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
