just my 2 cents.
[snip]
>
> > + fsl,cpm-brg = <1>;
> > + fsl,cpm-command = <0090>;
>
> Are these two documented? Your patch queue is too
> long for me to check for myself.
>
In fact, there were different approaches to describe CPM, and I am sure this is
not the end.
These aren't documented, and I think we do not need that so far: I am pretty
sure this will change
to something more comfortable as new similar ports will follow-up. Meanwhile,
values are self-description
for anybody familiar with this SoC.
> > - [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> > + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>
> Maybe use a more generic name, I have no idea what a
> "BCSR" is.
>
IIRC, QE stuff, when first introduced, had bcsr bindings, that were discussed
and agreed here.
--
Sincerely, Vitaly
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
