On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:16, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Tested on 8641HPCN. > > Which glibc versions? glibc-2.4 and newer are fine without the > patch already, glibc-2.3 seems to get away by accident; but 2.2 > (and before) are the problematic ones. > > No other userland program has been identified as needing this > fix, btw -- thankfully, or the testing matrix would be _huge_. > > > Segher
Segher, Needless to say, one that showed the problem beforehand. :-) But to be precise: [root:~] ls -lsa /usr/lib/libglib* 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 18005314 24012 21 Aug 15 2005 /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0 -> libglib-1.2.so.0.0.10* 536 -rwxrwxr-x 1 18005314 24012 540931 Apr 8 2003 /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0.0.10* 1064 -rw-rw-r-- 1 18005314 24012 1084256 Apr 8 2003 /usr/lib/libglib.a 4 -rwxrwxr-x 1 18005314 24012 662 Apr 8 2003 /usr/lib/libglib.la* 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 18005314 24012 21 Aug 15 2005 /usr/lib/libglib.so -> libglib-1.2.so.0.0.10* Thanks, jdl _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
